劇情簡(jiǎn)介
Hyeon-joon是一個(gè)對(duì)夜晚活動(dòng)更感興趣的人，而不是他的未來(lái)。有一天，一個(gè)漂亮的女人在他對(duì)面開(kāi)了一家服裝店。她漂亮、富有、善良。Hyeon-joon試圖把她變成自己的，他愿意做任何事情。
為你推薦
幻想游戲
久本雅美,板野友美,田中幸太朗,仙石南早見(jiàn)真紀(jì)子是在大型建筑承包商就職的精英女強(qiáng)人。早見(jiàn)專注工作，目前單身，但她其實(shí)是“深夜尋找內(nèi)衣”的網(wǎng)站背后神秘的女神。她把貼身衣物藏在街道，給提示讓人們?nèi)ふ摇Ｓ幸惶欤缫?jiàn)遇見(jiàn)了在公園露宿的葵。葵是網(wǎng)站“向丈夫復(fù)仇”上的一名頗有影響力的博主。她趁丈夫在外工作，秘密向丈夫復(fù)仇。在現(xiàn)代網(wǎng)絡(luò)文化之下面對(duì)復(fù)雜的事件，兩個(gè)女人關(guān)系漸漸密切。
母親往事
米洛·馬查多·格拉納,萊拉·貝蒂,約瑟芬·約比,喬納森·科恩,安娜·勒尼,讓娜·巴利巴爾,雪兒薇·瓦丹Paris, 1963. The youngest of a family of six, Roland, is a boy like no other. According to the doctors, he'll never walk, but his stubborn mother, Esther, simply refuses to accept this.
首都消失
渡瀨恒彥,名取裕子,山下真司,江角英明,大瀧秀治,石橋蓮司,石野陽(yáng)子,加藤治子,岸部一德,三木紀(jì)平,夏八木勛,龍雷太,相馬剛?cè)?丹波哲郎,津村鷹志,渡邊文雄,財(cái)津一郎,海老名美どり這部災(zāi)難影片背景以現(xiàn)代日本為中心，主要描寫(xiě)東京突然被一股莫名的濃霧所籠罩，整個(gè)都會(huì)好像一下子消失了似的，各地政府及科研人員因此極為震驚，急忙組織起來(lái)研究對(duì)策。但是人們卻無(wú)法穿越濃霧進(jìn)入東京首都圈。這場(chǎng)濃霧形成了一個(gè)無(wú)法穿越的電磁屏障。而圈外的科學(xué)家們則在受損嚴(yán)重的軍用偵察機(jī)上得到靈感，利用即將到來(lái)的臺(tái)風(fēng)和雷暴雨，加上人工大功率電磁干擾機(jī)，終于化解了這場(chǎng)戲劇般的非自然危機(jī)。 這原本該是一個(gè)不錯(cuò)的富有戲劇張力的構(gòu)思，但拍出來(lái)的片子卻教人不敢叫好，劇中女記者的角色刻劃不具感染力，而她和男記者之間時(shí)好時(shí)壞的關(guān)系描寫(xiě)也讓人感覺(jué)莫名其妙，確是讓觀眾感覺(jué)象一場(chǎng)霧。
詭秘陰宅
茱莉亞·克斯奇茲,Marii Weichsler,邁克爾·品克,Leon Orlandianyi,Inge Maux,Finn Reiter,Benno Rosskopf,Lars Bitterlich,Lisa Stern,Christina Cervenka一對(duì)年幼的兄弟跟家人一起從大城市搬到偏遠(yuǎn)小鎮(zhèn)，卻發(fā)現(xiàn)新家并不單純。他們能否與新朋友們一起解開(kāi)家中的險(xiǎn)惡謎團(tuán)？
好像一切都很糟糕
Melis Sevin?,Melisa Bostanc?o?lu,?brahim Ar?c?,Mert Can SevimliAy?e, Ali, Mehmet and Zeynep are middle-class millennials struggling to make ends meet in Istanbul. Either still living with their parents or hardly getting by without help from their families, they are all beset by similar woes: money crunch, joblessness, social isolation. In view of the world’s horrors that Zeynep enumerates in her diary entries, these are minor problems, ‘slight disasters’, but they are all-consuming, at least to the extent of making them cry in the still of the night. However, Umut Subasi’s first feature, Almost Entirely a Slight Disaster, is not a melodrama. With an appealingly light touch, it diagnoses the malaise of a generation that has run up against a dead end, one whose future prospects are indistinguishable from a game of chance. This is a world where astrology, the lottery and online personality tests compete with visa and job applications as life-shaping elements. Fittingly, the film is structured around chance and coincidence, with its handful of characters encountering each other in every permutation, as though there were no world outside this small social bubble. With self-aware, frontal framing that pins characters to their surroundings and a counterintuitive musical score that turns pathos into humour, Subasi offers a social-media movie without social media, one whose characters are united in their double lives and frustrated desires. 源自：https://iffr.com/en/iffr/2023/films/almost-entirely-a-slight-disaster
天啟Z：完結(jié)的起點(diǎn)
何塞·馬利亞·亞茲皮克,貝塔·巴斯克斯,伊里婭·德?tīng)枴だ飱W,Francisco Ortiz,Jesús Lloveras,Sergio Crespo,Ali Boulabiar,Mouad Ghazouan,Elena Seijo,Marta Poveda,Ana Garcia Molero,Paloma Otero,Beka Lemonjava,Alberto Ladrón de Guevara,Yuri Mykhaylychenko,Hicham Malayo,Arántzazu Ruiz,María一種類(lèi)似狂犬病的疾病在全球傳播開(kāi)來(lái)，將感染者變成極具攻擊性的生物。馬內(nèi)爾帶著他的貓躲在家中，憑借他的智慧生存下來(lái)。很快，他們將不得不外出覓食，尋找陸地和海上的安全之所。《天啟Z：完結(jié)的起點(diǎn)》是一個(gè)身體和情感上的生存故事，伴隨著刺激的打斗、緊張的氣氛、瘋狂的感染......以及一只脾氣暴躁的貓。
等待方舟
耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達(dá),卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚(yáng)·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart. Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory? n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in. What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts. On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired. One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places. Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.