劇情簡介
豪宅地下室僅限於男性，誰是被騙被迫和一個男人在一起像一個體大學生..,為了求生，西田最終放棄了人性尊嚴，回復原始野性的一面，而森田等人則在另一邊透過攝影機拍下種種極端ＳＭ的情節，一套終極真實的SM電影將要誕生
為你推薦
巴黎廚房
迪米特里·納佐羅夫,葉蓮娜·波德卡明斯卡婭,德米特里·納吉耶夫,馬克·博加泰爾夫,文森特·佩雷斯時尚的餐廳大都市“莫奈”紅紅火火。正是在這里，維克和馬克西姆要慶祝期待已久的婚禮。但計劃有變，當餐廳是規定會談俄羅斯和法國的總統！餐廳隊慘敗，被迫進入“流亡” - 在巴黎舉行。有廚師用馬克斯面臨危險的競爭對手：廚師 - 與近親，和馬克西姆 - 與一個英俊的尼古拉斯，誰轉過頭比維克起泡酒香檳更好！而這還不是他的“全城熱戀”中的所有挑戰，你應該試著挽回面子，喂總統和克服障礙萬元點菜法國文化……
世外逃劫
錫德·盧塞羅,碧優緹·岡薩雷斯,詹姆斯·布蘭科喪尸危機爆發后，一家人躲到一處偏僻的農場。然而，當他們在這個荒涼的世界求生時，隱藏多年的痛苦秘密給這家人造成了巨大陰影。
黑暗收割
卡塞伊·萊克斯,艾默莉·克魯奇菲爾德,Dustin Ceithamer,亞歷杭德羅·阿卡拉,以斯拉·巴茲頓,杰瑞米·戴維斯,伊莉莎白·里瑟,盧克·柯比,Austin Autry,梅根·貝斯特,杰克·布雷楠,布里坦·道爾頓,史蒂文·麥卡錫,Maclean Fish,納扎利·德姆克維奇,West Mulholland,Carter Heintz,Logan Tomanek,Dylan McEwan,Ryder Dueck大衛·斯雷德(《漢尼拔》)將為米高梅執導新片[黑暗收割](Dark Harvest，暫譯)。影片根據同名恐怖小說改編，邁克爾·吉里奧([龍與地下城])撰寫劇本。故事發生在1963年的萬圣節，圍繞著一個叫“十月男孩”展開。每年萬圣節，他都會手拿屠刀，從玉米地里爬起來，走向小鎮。無論是獵人還是獵物，“十月男孩”都是一年一度生死儀式的獎品。皮特知道，殺死“十月男孩”是他逃離這個窮途末路的小鎮的唯一機會。他愿意冒著生命危險去贏得勝利。但在夜晚結束之前，皮特將發現“十月男孩”可怕的真正秘密。
守護者2025
塔提阿娜·瑪斯拉尼,羅西弗·薩瑟蘭,伯克特·圖爾頓,艾琳·博伊斯,泰絲·登根斯坦,克萊爾·福萊森,克里斯汀·帕克,洛根·皮爾斯,艾拉·韋杰爾,格倫·戈登,伊芙琳·伯克,吉娜·武爾塔焦,艾琳·蒂普爾一對愛侶Liz和Malcolm去到一座偏僻的小屋度假，Malcolm卻因意外先回城了，留下Liz獨自一人，她很快發現這座小屋有著邪惡可怕的過去，如今纏上了自己。
箱男
永瀨正敏,淺野忠信,佐藤浩市,白本彩奈,澀川清彥,中村優子,川瀨陽太這部1973年的小說由安部公房創作，講述了一位無名男子放棄自己的身份，頭頂一個大紙箱生活的故事。在東京街頭游蕩時，他遇到了各種各樣的人物。
新狂蟒之災
保羅·路德,杰克·布萊克,史蒂夫·扎恩,坦迪·牛頓,艾斯·庫珀,丹妮拉·曼希沃,艾農·斯凱,本·勞森,賽爾頓·梅羅,Renee Herbert,婭絲明·卡西姆,Aimee Bah,塞巴斯蒂安·瑟羅,Jack Waters,Diego Arnary,Cal Rein,Matt Aristizabal,胡依·西卡多·吉亞斯,Romeo Ellard,Reagan George為了翻拍影史經典《狂蟒之災》，格里夫（保羅·路德 飾）和道格（杰克·布萊克 飾）成立史上最窮劇組！在唯一一條演員蛇因傷下線后，他們決定深入亞馬遜雨林捉蛇補位，卻意外遇上真巨蟒，原本滑稽混亂的片場瞬間淪為致命險境。在蛇口之下四處逃竄的他們，最終是會全員殞命還是順利殺青？
等待方舟
耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達,卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart. Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory? n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in. What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts. On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired. One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places. Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.