在線看
同款熱播
機器人8號
(甘)網影審字(2022)第001號，甘肅未來影業有限公司
陽光姐妹淘2011
沈恩敬,閔孝琳,姜素拉,南寶拉,陳熙瓊,金時厚,柳好貞,樸真珠,李妍京,金甫美,千玗嬉,李璟榮25年前，高中生任娜美（沈恩京 飾）一家從全羅道搬到漢城，娜美入讀真德女子高中，因方言濃重怯于開口的娜美幸運的得到了同班大姐頭夏春花（姜索拉 飾）的維護，并與圍繞在夏春花周圍的執著于雙眼皮的金玫瑰、滿嘴臟話的黃珍熙、夢想成為作家的徐金玉、要成為韓國小姐的俞福姬以及沉默傲慢的美人鄭秀智等五人結識。在一次和不良少女團對決之后，春花和娜美等七人組成了“Sunny”團體……多年以后，家庭主婦娜美在去醫院探望母親時偶然重逢了身患絕癥住院的春花，后者希望在生命的最后兩個月內，能夠再見當年的Sunny成員。娜美找到金玫瑰，兩人委托私家偵探尋找當年的同伴，而那些關于青春的回憶，也在一個個熟悉的名姓后面再次被喚醒。
浪扼三焦
卡拉·朱里,Véronique Tshanda Beya,Esperanza Martin González-Quevedo,Alessia Raschellà,沙夏·萊伊艾瑪在夜深人靜的時候被帶走了，渾身是瘀傷，意外懷孕了。在婦女庇護所找到了一個新家，她重新發現了自己失去的一面。在住在避難所的婦女和兒童中，個人創傷交織在一起。盡管他們有分歧，但一種微妙的姐妹情誼出現了。“一部關于女性為自尊和獨立而戰的電影，面對一個剝奪她們發言權的世界。這部電影將觀眾帶到了一個女性避難所的墻壁后面，向他們展示了一個令人驚訝的充滿活力的世界，那里的生活正在重建。如果有痛苦，也有力量、快樂和希望。角色和他們的故事植根于真實的經歷和情感，由演員和非演員共同扮演。情感誠實至關重要”。導演的筆記。
弗蘭茨
伊丹·魏斯,彼得·庫爾特,耶諾夫法·波科娃,伊凡·特洛伊,Sandra Korzeniak,卡塔琳娜·斯塔克,塞巴斯蒂安·施瓦茨,亞倫·弗里斯,卡羅爾·舒勒,Gesa Shermuly,揚·布達爾,約瑟夫·特洛伊,卡雷爾·多布雷,Daniel Dongres,René Hofschneider,米哈爾·伊斯特尼克,弗拉迪米爾·雅沃爾斯基,Václav Jirácek,Michal Kern,Stepán Klán阿格涅絲卡·霍蘭憑借這部迄今為止最具野心的作品達成了導演生涯的巔峰，她呈現了一部關于20世紀捷克標志性作家弗朗茨·卡夫卡的傳記片。影片以萬花筒般的拼貼手法構建而成，追隨卡夫卡留下的足跡——從19世紀的布拉格出發，直至他在維也納辭世，時間跨度涵蓋第一次世界大戰及之后。《弗朗茨》一片將為觀眾提供一個獨特的視角，一窺這位文學巨匠背后的人生軌跡。
靈異隧道實錄
貝爾·德利亞,Andy Rodoreda,Steve Davis,盧克·阿諾德,戈蘭·D·克魯特,James Caitlin,Ben Maclaine,彼得·麥卡拉姆,Rebecca Clay,Shannon Harvey,Arianna Gusi,Russell Jeffrey,Jessica Fallico,Ben James,Peter Overton,瑞妮·林,丹·伊利克澳大利亞悉尼，新南威爾士正遭受嚴重的干旱，水資源短缺成為亟待解決的問題。為了應對這一情況，政府決定開發一項水資源循環利用的項目，其中包括將位于悉尼城市下方的一段廢棄的鐵路隧道加以利用。圍繞隧道的改造和難民去向，在社會上引起了巨大爭論。雖然沸沸揚揚，但是該廢棄隧道的改造計劃卻戛然而止。與此同時，關于隧道中存在著神秘怪物的傳言也愈演愈烈。 一段Youtube上流傳的視頻引起了女記者娜塔莎·華納（貝爾·戴利亞 Bel Deliá 飾）的注意，她聯系了幾名業內的好友和同事，帶著攝像器材前往隧道中一探究竟，恐怖的旅程就此拉開序幕……
等待方舟
耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達,卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart. Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory? n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in. What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts. On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired. One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places. Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.